article

Mapuche ceremonial landscape, social recruitment and resource rights

World archaeology22 (2)Published In 1990 • Pages: 223-241

By: Dillehay, Tom D..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This paper presents a summary of the main variables accounting for the construction and distribution of historic and contemporary ceremonial fields and earthen burial mounds in the Mapuch society of Chile.This study reveals that monument building is related to the changing social relations between different groups and to a set of historically contingent factors - i. e., long-term kinship sedimentation, residential contiguity of related lineages, protection of land use rights, and profitable alliance-making and trade-excahnge affairs. Increased social and political complexity are achieved by a few local chiefs when they regulate the annual itinerary fo multiple ceremonial events at special ceremonial sites. The corresponding spatial and architectural expression of these relations are discussed, as well as their broader implications (p. 241).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Burial practices and funerals
Lineages
Sacred objects and places
Organized ceremonial
Cult of the dead
Community heads
Status, role, and prestige
Miscellaneous structures
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Mapuche
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2017
RegionThe area the document pertains to
South America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Central Andes
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnoarchaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle; 2007
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
not specified
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
south central Chile
NotesAdditional notes
Tom D. Dillehay
Includes bibliographical references (p. 239-241)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
75646489
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Mapuche Indians