article

The Uru-Chipaya Indians of Carangas

Journal de la Société des Americanistes de Paris, n.s.27Published In 1935 • Pages: HRAF ms: 1-223

By: Métraux, Alfred, Reynolds, Priscilla.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This is a basic source on the ethnography and language of the Chipaya segment of the Uru-Chipaya ethnolinguistic group of Atahuallpa (formerly Carangas) province, Oruro department. The monograph focuses upon religion, material culture (including the subsistence economy), and language—in that order—with valuable but much briefer data on environment, population, settlement patterns, and social organization. Probably the best section is that on material culture. The data on religion consist largely of descriptions of rituals and ceremonies, with very little functional analysis. The treatment of social organization is minimal. Despite these drawbacks, Uru-Chipaya ethnography is of particular significance from a historical standpoint. The author demonstrates that the Chipaya have retained many ancient Andean culture traits. As a consequence, Chipaya culture provides a basis for a deeper understanding or interpretation of Inca ethnographic and archeological data. A good deal of comparative cultural material is presented concerning the Inca and the Aymara.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Cultural identity and pride
Linguistic identification
Community structure
Inter-ethnic relations
Territorial hierarchy
General character of religion
Missions
Organized ceremonial
Status, role, and prestige
Prayers and sacrifices
Congregations
Sacred objects and places
Religious and educational structures
Music
Acculturation and culture contact
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Uru-Chipaya
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2014
RegionThe area the document pertains to
South America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Central Andes
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Robert O. Lagacé ; 1966
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1930-1931
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1930-1931
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Oruro department, Bolivia
NotesAdditional notes
Alfred Métraux
Translation of: [Les Indiens Uro-Cipaya de Carangas]
Translated for the HRAF files by Priscilla Reynolds in 1966
Not translated for the files: pages 395-415 of volume 27, consisting of myths and texts; and pages 342-394 of volume 28, consisting of word list, native texts, and bibliography
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
09000875
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Uru Indians