article

The scientific basis for Shipibo soil classification and land use: changes in soil-plant associations with cash cropping

American anthropologist91 (1)Published In 1989 • Pages: 83-100

By: Behrens, Clifford A..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Since the Shipibo began cash cropping rice, their land use patterns have changed with proportionately less utilization of soft sandy soils, which are best for staple Musa production, and greater use of harder clayey soils, which are more suitable for rice and root crops. Statistical analysis of soil samples reveals the physical-chemical basis for Shipibo soil categories and indicates the effect of swidden agriculture on levels of important soil characteristics. While cultural principles for planting have summarized these important ecological relationships in the past, they are often violated with increasing rice production. Examination of time allocation and food consumption data shows that changes in Shipibo land use patterns are associated with higher labor costs during brief periods of the agricultural cycle and greater dependence on domesticated animal foods (p. 83).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Soil
Tillage
Cereal agriculture
Land use
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Shipibo
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2002
RegionThe area the document pertains to
South America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Amazon and Orinoco
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 2001
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
June 1980-August 1981
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1980-1981
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
village of Nuevo Eden, headwaters of the Pisqui River, Peru
NotesAdditional notes
Clifford A. Behrens
Includes bibliographical references (p. 97-100)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
17015424
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Shipibo-Conibo Indians