article

A re-examination of Natchez sociopolitical complexity: a view from the Grand Village and beyond

Southeastern archaeology16 (2)Published In 1997 • Pages: 97-112

By: Lorenz, Karl G. (Karl Gregory).

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This study tries to square the historical and archaeological data on the Natchez, focusing on sociopolitical organization and settlement hierarchy. The author concludes that the Natchez were a weak "cycling" chiefdom where the authority of the two principal chiefs in Grand Village, the Great Sun and the Tattooed Serpent, was limited and constantly challenged by the chiefs of outlying villages.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Theoretical orientation in research and its results
Historical and archival research
Prehistory
Settlement patterns
Territorial hierarchy
External trade
Status, role, and prestige
Form and rules of government
Chief executive
External relations
Burial practices and funerals
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Natchez
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Woodlands
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Archaeologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Ian Skoggard; 2019
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
not applicable
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1550-1730
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Adams, Jefferson and Claiborne counties, Mississippi, United States
NotesAdditional notes
Karl G. Lorenz
Includes bibliographical references (p. 111-112)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
84649369
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Natchez Indians