Book

Hmong Paj Ntaub: a comparison of design motifs, color, size and ornamental construction techniques between 1977-1979 and 1981-1983

University Microfilms InternationalAnn Arbor, Mich.Published In 1990 • Pages:

By: Hafner-Hoppenworth, Annette Yvonne.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This source examines the physical attributes of two samples of Hmong PAJ NTAUB to determine what changes have occurred between the years 1977-1979 and 1981-1983. (PAJ NTAUB is a form of decorative design applied to clothing, belts, sashes, etc., involving various aspects of embroidery, applique or batik.) Each piece in the collected sample was analyzed and the finding interpreted in respect to additional data provided from interviews with individuals assisting the Hmong. These data were then submitted to an analysis of variance using chi-square and the 'z' test. The results revealed a statistically significant decrease with time in the average number of borders, number of colors, and ornamental construction techniques used per piece (p. ii).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Theoretical orientation in research and its results
Recording and collecting in the field
Organization and analysis of results of research
Clothing manufacture
Buying and selling
Decorative art
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
North American Hmong
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2000
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Regional, Ethnic and Diaspora Cultures
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
Book
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Art Historian
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 1991
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1985-1986
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1977-1983
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Lansing, Mich.
NotesAdditional notes
[by] Annette Yvonne Hafner-Hoppenworth
Thesis (MA) - Michigan State University, 1989
UM 1337044
Includes bibliographical references (p. 122-127)
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Hmong Americans