article

Life histories, reproductive histories: rural South African women's narratives of fertility, reproductive health and illness

Journal of southern African studies27 (2)Published In 2001 • Pages: 311-328

By: Harrison, Abigail, Montgomery, Elizabeth.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Qualitative research in the field of reproductive health is important in elucidating an understanding of women's roles in both social and biological reproduction, and in gaining access to women's perception of their own health problems. In this study the authors examine rural Zulu women's perspectives on reproductive health and fertility as part of their life histories, and assessed knowledge of reproductive health and related practices. Findings indicate that, in spite of recent declines in fertility in South Africa, child bearing remains the princiiipal form of self-expression among older Zulu women, with fertility a necessary step toward achieving social status as a woman. This status, however, does not confer autonomy or power on women, but rather serves as a means of meeting social expectations (p. 311).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Interviewing in research
Basis of marriage
Mode of marriage
Parents-in-law and children-in-law
Preventive medicine
Conception
Pregnancy
Childbirth
Illegitimacy
Gender roles and issues
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Zulu
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2005
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Africa
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Southern Africa
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Medical Personnel
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 2004
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
ca.1990s
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa
NotesAdditional notes
Abigail Harrison and Elizabeth Montgomery
Includes bibliographical references
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
75642679
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Zulu (African people)