essay

Purity and impurity in the death rituals of Bengal

Bengal : studies in literature, society and history (27)Published In 1976 • Pages: 115-120

By: Bhattacharyya, Manibrata.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Notions of purity (SAUCA) and impurity (ASAUCA) are significant factors influencing the social life of Bengali Hindus. In this article Bhattacharyya examines the meaning of these concepts in relationship to rituals associated with death; in particular, those ceremonies by means of which '…the deceased is progressively transformed from a person, now dead, to a spirit (PRETA), and then to an ancestor (PITRI)' (p. 115). Throughout the transformation process the author shows how purity and impurity are central themes, for as the deceased moves from one stage to the next, each previous stage becomes impure and must be 'overcome' through the proper acts of purification by members of the deceased's kin. Thus, to the Hindu, purity and impurity are conceived as conditional states, relative in nature, yet in constant flux (although this latter point is not elaborated on in the text). Prior to each transformational stage the deceased is impure relative to the status toward which he or she is changing, but pure relative to the status from which he or she is changing.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Lineages
Burial practices and funerals
Mourning
Eschatology
Purification and atonement
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Bengali
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2002
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Asia
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
South Asia
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Unknown
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 1992
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1968-1972 [p. 119]
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
not specified
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Kangsbati Valley, West Bengal, India
NotesAdditional notes
[by] Manibrata Bhattacharyya
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
none
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Bengalis