article

Bone transfers: incomplete replacement in Rmeet ritual exchange

Taiwan Journal of Anthropology4 (1)Published In 2006 • Pages: 79-112

By: Sprenger, Guido.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
Rmeet society is organized into localized patrilineal lineages forming alliances as “wife-givers” and “wife-takers” that are not only the precondition for physical reproduction, but also the ritual source of fertility for the fields and health for the individual. Both functions are made possible through the exchange of duties and responsibilities. Wife-takers pay a bride price to wife-givers. Lineage members contribute gift items to mortuary sacrifices in exchange for delayed reciprocal returns for other lineage members. This article argues that these exchanges are conceived of as essentially unequal in value. Wife-givers, for example, claim that the bride price is of much less value than the bride as a person. The Rmeet resolve this problem by displacing the items into a religiously-charged third object, the value of which redefines the original value of the items. The analysis supports the theory of asymmetric alliance.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Regulation of marriage
Mode of marriage
Arranging a marriage
Burial practices and funerals
Cult of the dead
Prayers and sacrifices
Lineages
Exchange transactions
Price and value
Kin relationships
Sacred objects and places
Inter-community relations
General character of religion
Gift giving
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Rmeet
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Asia
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Southeast Asia
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Anthropologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Teferi Abate Adem ; 2018
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
2000-2002, 2005
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
2000-2005
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Takheung, Luang Namtha, Laos
NotesAdditional notes
Guido Sprenger
Includes bibliographical references (p. 109-111)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
2003261195
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Lamet (Laotian people)