book chapter

The collapse of the Soviet Union: nationalism during perestroika and afterwards (1985-summer 1992)

After the USSR: ethnicity, nationalism, and politics in the commonwealth of independent statesMadison, Wis.Published In 1995 • Pages: 2-53

By: Khazanov, Anatoly M. (Anatoly Michailovich).

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This analysis of developments in the Soviet Union under Gorbachev’s gradual political and economic reforms focuses on the power relations between the Russian-dominated central government in Moscow and the ethnically-constituted republics and special administrative areas within the union (for which considerable historical background is given). Although reforms were meant to preserve and strengthen the USSR, pressure for increased autonomy and cultural rights within the minority enclaves led to disintegration. Ironically, the final push came from the demographically and politically dominant ethnic Russians who should have been Gorbachev's natural allies in his effort to preserve the union. (See Khazanov [1995 “References”] for bibliographic references.)
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
History
Economic planning and development
Speech
Ethnic stratification
Social relationships and groups
Inter-ethnic relations
Government institutions
Political machines
Political movements
Instigation of war
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Russians
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Europe
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Europe
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
book chapter
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Anthropologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Teferi Abate Adem ; 2019
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date given
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1930-1992
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Soviet Union (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan)
NotesAdditional notes
Anatoly M. Khazanov
for bibliograpical references, see document 104:Khazanov
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
95005696
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Nationalism--Former Soviet republics