article

Modern and traditional administration of justice in New Guinea

Journal of legal pluralism and unofficial law (19)Published In 1981 • Pages: 93-116

By: Pospisil, Leopold J..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This study describes the change in the Kapauku political and legal system under colonial administration. Prior to contact, the Kapauku political system was based on kinship organization, contractual agreements and achieved status. The Kapauku headman gained authority through his wealth and generosity, creating a retinue of dependents. Turnover was common as younger and more hard working men came to prominence. The headman was also a legal authority, adjuticating cases based on Kapauku legal codes and precendent. The Dutch imposed a territorial-based political system selecting for each village permanent headmen who had no traditional support. They also imposed a legalistic system of justice in which cases were judged only according to legal codes and imprisonment replaced traditional forms of economic sanctions. Pospisil argues that the 'civilization' of the Kapauku contradicts the expected theoretical cultural transformation from one of status to contract and from punitive law to restitution.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Community heads
Territorial hierarchy
Administrative agencies
Legal norms
Judicial authority
Trial procedure
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Kapauku
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
1998
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Oceania
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Melanesia
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Ian Skoggard ; 1996
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1954-1955, 1959, 1962, 1975, 1979
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1954-1979
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Kamu Valley, central Highlands, Irian Jaya, Indonesia
NotesAdditional notes
Leopold Pospisil
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
82643292
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Kapauku (New Guinea people)