Book

The Navajo-Hopi land dispute: an American tragedy

University of New Mexico PressAlbuquerquePublished In 1994 • Pages:

By: Brugge, David M..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This is a firsthand account of the Healing vs. Jones land dispute between the Hopi and Navajo. Brugge worked for the Navajo, researching archeaological sites, archives, and life histories for proof of Navajo land occupancy. The 1882 Executive Order Reservation set aside land within the Navajo Reservation for the Hopi. Disputes arose over encroachment by Navajo herds and Hopi expansion. Tensions came to a head when mineral and oil deposits were discovered. The Hopi lay claim to the subsurface rights, which the Navajo disputed. Proof of occupancy became a major argument in the court case. Brugge documents the trials and hearings, and the efforts to educated and inform people on the reservation. While the trial lawyers for the Hopi tried to draw a wedge between 'peace-loving' Hopi and the 'savage' Navajo, Brugge shows that the actual split was between traditional Hopi who supported the Navajo and a modern educated elite whose interests lay with White politicians and developers. Brugge was not privy to, nor did he research, the possible collusion between mining companies, state politicans, and Hopi leaders. His major concern and focus is the racist arguments of the lawyers.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Internal migration
Settlement patterns
Real property
Acquisition and relinquishment of property
Public welfare
External relations
Trial procedure
Execution of justice
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Navajo
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2004
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Southwest and Basin
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
Book
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnographer
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Ian Skoggard ; 2003
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1958-1973
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1882-1974
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Arizona, United States
NotesAdditional notes
David M. Brugge
Includes bibliographical references (p. 285-294) and index
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
93046954
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Navajo Indians