Book

Aleuts in transition: a comparison of two villages

Published for the Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, University of Washington PressSeattlePublished In 1976 • Pages:

By: Jones, Dorothy Miriam.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
In this study, Jones compares two Aleutian towns which have had very different development trajectories and social change consequences in the post-World War Two period. One town was a former U.S. military base which never quite recovered from the occupation. A group of local whites continue to control both the economy and politics, such as the school board and municipal administration, looking down on their Aleut neighbors. The other village was more remote, less affected by outsiders, except for Norwegian fishermen, who settled there and intermarried with locals. The Norwegians taught the local Aleut modern trawler fishing. The Aleut population of the first town has been beset by social problems, including alcoholism and juvenile delinquency. According to Jones, the major difference between the two towns lies in the degree of control local Aleutians have had over their economic and political conditions.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Acculturation and culture contact
Marine hunting
Canning industry
Labor relations
Ethnic stratification
Towns
Public finance
Public works
External relations
Social problems
Status of children
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Aleut
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2007
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Arctic and Subarctic
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
Book
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Ian Skoggard ; 2005
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1967-1972
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1945-1970
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
'New Harbor' and 'Iliaka,' Aleutian Islands, Alaska, United States
NotesAdditional notes
by Dorothy M. Jones
Includes bibliographical references (p. 117-122) and index
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
76007788
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Aleuts
Acculturation--Case studies