essay

To be aged, Hispanic, and female: the triple risk

Twice a minority : Mexican American womenSt. Louis, MissouriPublished In 1980 • Pages: 249-258

By: Stephens, Richard C., Oser, George T., Blau, Zena Smith.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This is a study of the problems facing the elderly (over 65) Mexican American woman in the United States. The authors examine those areas of life that seem particularly important to the elderly, such as economic conditions (e.g., loss of income), health status, morale, and community involvement. While controlling for the important variables of age and social class, comparisons are made to Anglo women, younger Mexican American women (aged 55-64), and to Mexican American males. From the analysis of their data the authors conclude that: (1) the older Mexican American female appears more disadvantaged that the older Anglo female; (2) the Mexican American female appears to be in a worse position than does the Mexican American male; and (3) the older Mexican American female fares worse than the younger Mexican American female (pp. 257-258).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Gender status
Classes
Senescence
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Chicanos
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2002
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Regional, Ethnic and Diaspora Cultures
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Social Scientist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 2001
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
not specified
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Texas, United States
NotesAdditional notes
Richard C. Stephens, George T. Oser, and Zena Smith Blau
Includes bibliographical references (p. 258)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
80011177
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Mexican Americans