essay

The nonconsenting sterilization of Mexican women in Los Angeles: issues of psychocultural rupture and legal redress in paternalistic behavioral environments

Twice a minority : Mexican American womenSt. Louis, MissouriPublished In 1980 • Pages: 235-248

By: Vélez-Ibáñez, Carlos G..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
The nonconsenting sterilization of Mexican women in a Los Angeles public medical center, and the resulting law suit against the hospital, is the primary focus of this study. Prior to the trial Vélez-I. was asked by the plintiff's lawyers to act as a consulting cultural antropologist for their clients assessing the possible cultural and social ramifications of the sterilization process on the lives of the ten women involved in the litigation. The data gathered by the author were later submitted at the trial but were largely ignored by the judge whose judicial decision came out in favor of the defendants (the medical center). Details of the author's preliminary findings, the trial itself, the legal personnel involved, and the text of the judge's decision are all described in this document.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Social personality
Population policy
Legal and judicial personnel
Initiation of judicial proceedings
Trial procedure
Conception
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Chicanos
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2002
RegionThe area the document pertains to
North America
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Regional, Ethnic and Diaspora Cultures
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 2001
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
Nov. 1, 1977-May 30, 1978
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1970s
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Los Angeles, California, United States
NotesAdditional notes
Carlos G. Vélez-I.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 248)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
80011177
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Mexican Americans