Book

La sociéte wolof: tradition et changement : les systèmes d'inégalité et de domination

KarthalaParisPublished In 1981 • Pages: 355

By: Diop, Abdoulaye Bara.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
In this study, Diop examines the structure and history of Wolof society. Wolof society is organized by a dual system of caste and class. The superior caste is the group of landowning cultivators and the inferior castes include artisans, singers, musicians, courtisans, and jesters. The lower castes provide necessary goods and services, and most importantly, as Diop sees it, respect in exchange for foodstuffs. According to Diop the Wolof caste system is primarily based on the principles of reciprocity rather than on an ideology of pollution and purity as Dumont argues for India, although such ideas are also present in the Wolof system. The class system is rooted in the Wolof monarchy and conquest state, which served the slave trade. Its order essentially rested on violence in which a warrior class dominated and royal slaves could obtain high rank. The spread of Islam brotherhoods in the colonial period mobilized an exploited peasantry, however, the French successfully backed the Wolof nobility in their wars against the Moslim sects. The brotherhood leaders eventually capitulated to become another buttress of the colonial order.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Castes
Classes
Slavery
Chief executive
Revolution
Priesthood
Congregations
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Wolof
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
1999
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Africa
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Western Africa
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
Book
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Sociologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Ian Skoggard ; 1998
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
not specified
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1200-1970
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Senegal
NotesAdditional notes
Abdoulaye-Bara Diop
Includes bibliographical references (p. 349-355)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
81199335
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Wolof (African people)