article

Political systems of pastoral Tuareg in Air and Ahaggar

Folk (København)1Published In 1959 • Pages: 67-131 , 7 plates

By: Nicolaisen, Johannes.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This article deals with the political system of two Tuareg groups, the Air and Ahaggar. It offers a description of the relations between noble and vassal tribes, and the role of the central authority and the limitations on his powers. Functionalist interpretations are given for these relationships and these are couched largely in economic terms. In addition there is a brief but clear discussion of environmental differences in the areas inhabited by these two Tuareg groups and the variations in the cycle of economic activities are described. Occasional references to other Tuareg groups are also included. There is also a rather lengthy discussion of Tuareg history and the authors' hypotheses about the introduction of the camel into North Africa. The document has been sub-headed for the Air and Ahaggar divisions. References to other Tuareg groups have been indexed for the appropriate cultural categories but no additional subheadings have been given.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Pastoral activities
Annual cycle
Territorial hierarchy
Ingroup antagonisms
Diet
Internal trade
Slavery
Kinship terminology
Tillage
Historical reconstruction
Clans
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Tuareg
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2010
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Africa
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Northern Africa
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Betty Potash ; 1960
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1951-1955
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1900-1956
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Niger and Algeria
NotesAdditional notes
Johannes Nicolaisen
Includes bibliographical references (p. 127 - 131)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
2007249024
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Tuaregs