article

Household and kin provisioning by Hadza men

Human nature24Published In 2013 • Pages: 280-317

By: Wood, Brian, Marlowe, Frank.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This article tests several theories about the evolutionary-ecological forces and politico-economic processes influencing the foraging and food sharing behavior of Hadza men. Data collected on food produced, received, and consumed at both the individual and household level show that Hadza men do not specialize in big game hunting as some researchers previously claimed. Instead, a significant amount of the food they bring home comes from hunting small game, and collecting honey and wild fruits. However, the study also shows that success in killing large game brings both nutritional and social benefits to the hunter. Nutritionally, the hunter allocates choice meat to his own household and close kin. Socially, the hunter gains increased respect and prestige by sharing the remaining meat with other camp members and visitors. The authors emphasize the significance of this analysis for understanding why Hadza women prefer good hunters as husbands, and why successful hunters have higher fertility rates than others.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Hunting and trapping
Annual cycle
Collecting
Settlement patterns
Division of labor by gender
Gift giving
Production and supply
Family relationships
Social personality
Diet
Nutrition
Infant feeding
Child care
Environmental quality
Basis of marriage
Functional and adaptational interpretations
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Hadza
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2019
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Africa
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Africa
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypesThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Biological Anthropologist
Anthropologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Teferi Abate Adem; 2018
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
2005-2007, 2009
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
2005-2009
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Lake Eyasi area, Tanzania
NotesAdditional notes
Brian M. Wood ; Frank W. Marlowe
Includes bibliographical references (p. 314-317)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
78640803
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Hatsa (African people)