Book

The cultural definition of political response: lineal destiny among the Luo

Academic PressLondonPublished In 1978 • Pages: xvii, 347

By: Parkin, David J..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This book analyzes the cultural and economic reasons for the continuity of polygyny among ethnic Luo families in Nairobi, Kenya. It shows that Luo men invested their hard earned urban wage in marrying two or more wives because of the practical advantages this institution gave them for maintaining residence and linkages both in Nairobi and their rural birth place. More specifically, polygyny enabled urban men to retain certain economic interests and political influence in the countryside while remaining in full-time urban wage employment and while living within an urban nuclear family of one co-wife and her children. They did so by alternating each co-wife to spend an equal time during the year in town and at the rural home, supervising the family smallholding.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Cultural identity and pride
Ethos
Functional and adaptational interpretations
Polygamy
Gender status
Education system
Urban and rural life
Family relationships
Social relationships and groups
Status, role, and prestige
Classes
Lineages
Mode of marriage
Regulation of marriage
Kinship regulation of sex
Extramarital sex relations
Ingroup antagonisms
Political parties
Political movements
Inter-ethnic relations
Sociocultural trends
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Luo
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2010
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Africa
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Africa
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
Book
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Anthropologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Teferi Abate Adem; 2009
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1968-1969
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1950-1978
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Nairobi and Luoland, Kenya
NotesAdditional notes
David Parkin
Includes bibliographical references (p. 331-340) and index
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
77093213
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Luo (Nilotic tribe) Social change
Language and culture
Ethnicity--Kenya