essay

Gender and life-course strategies among the Gusii

African families and the crisis of social changeWestport, Conn.Published In 1997 • Pages: 253-267

By: Håkansson, Thomas, LeVine, Robert Alan.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
In Gusii society not only is the road toward an ideal old age different for men and women, but the ways in which each gender achieves the ideal are mutually contradictory. As in many other African societies, the family provides security and comfort in old age. However, principles of separation and authority based on gender, generation, kinship, and affinity, which define relationships between Gusii family members, differentially affect the life course goals of men and women. These principles are expressed in the division of labor, resource control, and rules of avoidance (CHINSONI). The authors' objective in this article is to explore the material and social consequences for the elderly of the structurally opposed life-course strategies that result from intrafamily dynamics in 1940-1989 Gusii society (p. 3).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Sociocultural trends
Real property
Saving and investment
Labor supply and employment
Mode of marriage
Family relationships
Polygamy
Education system
Senescence
Status and treatment of the aged
Gender roles and issues
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Gusii
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2000
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Africa
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Africa
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
essay
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 2005
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1940-1989
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Kisi District, western Kenya
NotesAdditional notes
N. Thomas Håkansson and Robert LeVine
Includes bibliographical references (p. 266-267)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
96045346
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Gusii (African people)