Book

Myth, ritual, and kingship in Buganda

Oxford University PressNew YorkPublished In 1991 • Pages:

By: Ray, Benjamin C..

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This is largely a historical study of Buganda kingship and critique of the theories of divine kingship and regicide. The author takes a position somewhere between purely political and symbolic analyses of kingship. According to Ray, the myths and rituals surrounding Buganda kingship have a basis in history: succession rituals replicate the historical events surrounding the founding of the kingdom, an act which legitimizes the new king's rule. Although it is true that many of the Buganda kings were killed, Ray sees this as a political rebellion by the clans against kingly abuse of power, the clan chiefs regarding themselves and the king as near equals. Furthermore, Ray argues that it was incumbent upon the king to arbitrarily kill even his own subjects in order to maintain both the social order and his pivotal position at the symbolic center of the realm. The study reveals how violence was an integral part of the king's charisma and power, although eventually leading to his demise.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Traditional history
Religious and educational structures
Clans
Chief executive
Burial practices and funerals
Mythology
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Ganda
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
1998
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Africa
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Eastern Africa
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
Book
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Ian Skoggard ; 1997
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
1972
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1300s-1972
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Uganda
NotesAdditional notes
by Benjamin C. Ray
Includes bibliographical references (p. 223-235) and index
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
90007127
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Ganda (African people)