article

Dahomey: the development of a proto-state; an essay in historical reconstruction

Dialectical anthropology21Published In 1996 • Pages: 121, 123, 127-216

By: Diamond, Stanley.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
This book reconstructs the historical processes that led to the growth of the Dahomey Kingdom, a traditional monarchial system located in the Gulf of Guinea. The main argument traces this centralized polity in traditional kin- and clan-based social organizations primarily associated with the Fon-speaking people of Benin. Much of the discussion is devoted to explaining this transition in political organization by focusing on specific themes including the nature of earlier kin-based bureaucracy, property rights, the meaning of personal despotism, the significance of customary laws against murder and suicide, and the function of institutionalized friendship. The analysis reveals much similarity with the evolution of state-level political systems in other parts of Africa.
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
Cultural identity and pride
Community structure
Kin relationships
Lineages
Social relationships and groups
Form and rules of government
Chief executive
Administrative agencies
Priesthood
Congregations
Organized ceremonial
Prayers and sacrifices
Real property
Legal norms
Sanctions
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Fon
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2016
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Africa
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Western Africa
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Anthropologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
5: Excellent Primary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
Teferi Abate Adem ; 2014
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
Not specified
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
1625-1960
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
Benin (Dahomey)
NotesAdditional notes
Stanley Diamond
Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-216)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
77649837
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Fon (African people)