article

Stratification without a state: the collapse of the Icelandic Commonwealth

Ethnos3-4Published In 1988 • Pages: 239-265

By: Durrenberger, E. Paul.

AbstractBrief abstract written by HRAF anthropologists who have done the subject indexing for the document
From the ninth century, when the first settlers came, until 1262 when it ceased to exist, the Icelandic Commonwealth was a stratified society without a state. There developed a class of independent householders who appropriated the production of a class of landless people. The householders gained access to land by supporting a class of chieftains who guaranteed their access by force. Each chieftain had to attempt to muster overwhelming force by expansion. This led to a period of conflict that ended when one chieftain was successful in gaining control of the island in the context of Norwegian royal hegemony. The collapse of the Commonwealth was not due to the introduction of Christianity, cultural changes, or Norwegian manipulation, but to the internal contradictions of a stratified society without a state (p. 239).
SubjectsDocument-level OCM identifiers given by the anthropology subject indexers at HRAF
External migration
Traditional history
Real property
Inheritance
External trade
Verbal arts
Status, role, and prestige
Classes
Slavery
Social relationships and groups
Ingroup antagonisms
Districts
Legal norms
Judicial authority
cultureCulture name from the Outline of World Cultures (OWC)
Early Icelanders
HRAF PubDateThe date HRAF published the document
2004
RegionThe area the document pertains to
Europe
Sub RegionThe more specific area the document pertains to, which is located within the Region
Scandinavia
Document TypeMay include journal articles, essays, collections of essays, monographs, or chapters/parts of monographs
article
Evaluation
Creator TypeThe type of person writing the document, e.g. Ethnographer, Missionary, Archaeologist, Folklorist, Linguist, Indigenous Person, and so on.
Ethnologist
Document Rating A ranking done by HRAF anthropologists based on the strength of the source material on a scale of 1 to 5, as follows: 1 - poor; 2 - fair; 3 - good, useful data, but not uniformly excellent; 4 - excellent secondary data; 5 - excellent primary data.
4: Excellent Secondary Data
AnalystThe HRAF anthropologist who subject indexed the document and prepared other materials for the eHRAF culture/tradition collection
John Beierle ; 2002
Field DateThe date the researcher conducted the fieldwork or archival research that produced the document
no date
Coverage DateThe date or dates that the information in the document pertains to
Icelandic Commonwealth Period (ninth-thirteenth centuries)
Coverage PlaceLocation of the research culture or tradition (often a smaller unit such as a band, community, or archaeological site)
general Iceland
NotesAdditional notes
E. Paul Durrenberger
Includes bibliographical references (p. 264-265)
LCCNLibrary of Congress Control Number
45053696
LCSHLibrary of Congress Subject Headings
Icelanders