article

Chiefly authority, leapfrogging headmen and the political economy of Zululand, South Africa, ca. 1930-1950

Journal of southern African studies27 (3) • Published In 2001 • Pages: 567-590

By: Mackinnon, Aran S..

Abstract
In early twentieth century South Africa, where white and capitalist domination of Africans was the central feature of the country's political economy, various elements of African society tried to use 'tradition' in a defensive manner to resist the pernicious effects of social and economic dislocation. During the 1930s and 1940s, the Zulu king and chiefs held popular support, despite their incorporation into the white state that threatened to undermine their legitimacy. This was, in part, because of their power over land allocation, and in part because they represent a symbolic and idealized past in wich the Zulu kingdom fought to defend itself against colonial conquest and intervention. Shula Marks first highlighted the importance of the Natal-Zululand case for understanding chiefly authority, as well as the chiefs' opposition to, and co-option by the state. This paper draws on her work to expand the discussion of Zulu chiefs and headmen, especially in the economic sphere, and argues that insufficient attention have been devoted to differences between northern and southern Zululand, and to the strategies of non-royal headmen in shaping the pattern of local authority (p. 567).
Subjects
Status, role, and prestige
Ingroup antagonisms
Community heads
Districts
Provinces
Chief executive
Public welfare
Legal and judicial personnel
Recruitment and training
culture
Zulu
HRAF PubDate
2005
Region
Africa
Sub Region
Southern Africa
Document Type
article
Evaluation
Creator Type
Historian
Document Rating
4: Excellent Secondary Data
Analyst
John Beierle ; 2004
Field Date
no date
Coverage Date
1930-1950
Coverage Place
KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa
Notes
Aran S. Mackinnon
Includes bibliographical references
LCCN
75642679
LCSH
Zulu (African people)