TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lemarchand, RenΘ
PY  - 1998
DA  - 1998//
TI  - Genocide in the Great Lakes: which genocide? whose genocide?
JO  - African studies review
SP  - 3
EP  - 16
VL  - Vol. 41
IS  - no. 1
PB  - African Studies Association [etc.]
KW  - Rundi (African people)
KW  - Barundi
KW  - Warfare
KW  - Aftermath of combat
KW  - Inter-ethnic relations
KW  - Instigation of war
KW  - Peacemaking
KW  - External relations
KW  - Social relationships and groups
KW  - Political parties
KW  - Political movements
KW  - Elections
KW  - Chief executive
KW  - Traditional history
KW  - History
AB  - This article is concerned with the politics of genocide in the Great Lakes region. It shows that basic disagreements between Hutu and Tutsi about who committed genocide and why are traceable in part to the uncritical of the term genocide to describe just about any type of ethnic violence, in part to the selective sifting of the evidence with a view to exonerating one group and condemning the other. Although Hutu and Tutsi are both guilty of genocide, the tendency to substitute collective guilt for individual culpability in the planning and execution of the killings can only result in distortion of the facts. There will be no peace in the Great Lakes region unless one takes seriously the task of shedding light on the circumstances, the scale and the consequences of the genocide of Hutu by Tutsi in Burundi (1972), of Tutsi and Hutu by Hutu in Rwanda (1994) and of Hutu by Tutsi in Congo (1996-1997).
SN  - 0002-0206
UR  - https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/document?id=fo58-006
LA  - English
N1  - RenT Lemarchand
ID  - fo58-006
Y1  - 2022-06-27
ER  -